Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; 29(4): 709-714, 2021 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1226482

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on conjunctival flora in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.Methods: This prospective, controlled study was conducted between June 2020 and December 2020. The study group consisted of 45 confirmed COVID-19 patients and 43 control subjects. The collected samples were inoculated into the Thioglycollate broth media without delay. The samples with growth were then passed on eosin methylene blue agar, sabouraud dextrose agar, chocolate agar, and 5% sheep blood agar solid media.Results: The mean age of the COVID-19 patients was 64.24 ± 15.4 years, and the control subjects were 59.72 ± 11.4 years. The culture positivity of conjunctiva samples in COVID-19 patients (95.6%) was statistically significantly higher than control subjects (76.7%) (p = .024). Coagulase-negative staphylococcus and Staphylococcus aureus' positivity was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients than control subjects (p < .05).Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 demonstrate significantly higher culture positivity on conjunctival flora than the control subjects.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Conjunctiva/microbiology , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Bacterial/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Eye Infections, Bacterial/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Bacterial/microbiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Turkey/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
J Med Virol ; 93(7): 4516-4522, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1156884

ABSTRACT

The aim is to comparatively evaluate the results of simultaneous conjunctiva and oropharynx-nasopharynx (ONP) swabs in patients who had presented to the outpatient department with a suspicion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). An ONP sample was obtained following bilateral conjunctiva swabs in 85 subjects with a contact history or symptoms but unknown SARS-CoV-2 status and with no ocular symptoms or findings. The results were evaluated according to the patient's symptoms and how the swab was taken. The conjunctiva swab was positive in 29 (34.1%) cases and the ONP swab in 20 (23.5%) cases. Both methods produced positive results in 11 (14.1%) cases. The mean cycle threshold (Ct ) value was 30.15 ± 3.41 in symptomatic cases and 33.62 ± 1.76 in asymptomatic cases (p = .008). The mean Ct value was 24.37 ± 3.48 when only the ONP swab was positive and 31.22 ± 1.99 when only the conjunctiva swab was positive. In cases that were positive by both methods, the mean Ct value was 25.21 ± 4.94 for the ONP swab and 30.29 ± 5.05 for the conjunctiva swab. We found higher SARS-CoV-2 detection rates with the conjunctiva swab than the ONP swab in cases with unknown SARS-CoV-2 status in the early period. In addition, the conjunctival viral load seemed to be higher in symptomatic cases than in asymptomatic cases. We, therefore, believe a conjunctiva swab could be an alternative method to detect SARS-CoV-2 at the time of the first presentation to the outpatient department.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Conjunctiva/virology , Nasopharynx/virology , Oropharynx/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Specimen Handling , Viral Load/methods , Young Adult
3.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(7): e14175, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1150136

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is primarily transmitted from person to person via airborne droplets. It is unclear whether it can be shed into human milk and transmitted to a child via breastfeeding. We investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in human milk samples of 15 mothers with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and in the throat swab samples of their infants. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study in which breast milk samples were collected from 15 mothers with COVID-19. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the whole human milk samples of the patients was investigated using RT-qPCR. All of the infants underwent a clinical follow-up during their 14-day isolation and their throat swab samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. RESULTS: Of 15 mothers with COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in milk samples from 4 mothers. The throat swab samples from these mothers' infants were found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Three of the four mothers were breastfeeding. In addition, during the 14-day isolation, all but three of the mothers breastfed their infants. Of the 12 breastfed infants, while the test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in throat swab samples was negative in 6 of the infants, the other 6 infants, who had mild COVID-19 symptoms, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Clinical outcomes of all mothers and infants were uneventful. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case series with the largest number of cases with SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity in human milk samples of mothers with COVID-19. However, we believe that the benefits of breastfeeding may outweigh the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , RNA, Viral
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL